Zohreh Shariatnaseri; nasrin kordnejad
Abstract
The study of interpretations of different periods shows that commentators have had different functions in the field of application of interpretive sources. The question of present article is how to use narration as one of the interpretive sources in the interpretation of the contemporary period and has ...
Read More
The study of interpretations of different periods shows that commentators have had different functions in the field of application of interpretive sources. The question of present article is how to use narration as one of the interpretive sources in the interpretation of the contemporary period and has reached some results. This descriptive-analytical study has turned the discussion into interpretations of the contemporary period. The result of this study showed that the method of contemporary commentators in using narrations has sometimes been the opposite of previous commentators, so that contemporaries have either not narrated some narrations, or in the face of narration with context (lip and verbal reason) with narration They have criticized the document and its signification and commented on the rejection and design of the narration. In a few cases, the narration has taken precedence over the context
