mohamad shabanpour; fardin darabi
Abstract
n Ibn Arabi's view, which has an Ash'arite theological basis, it does not give any role to man and natural causes in the world system; And this is because of his belief in algebra. Allameh Tabataba'i has a Shiite view and for natural causes, not only did he not consider it roleless, but ...
Read More
n Ibn Arabi's view, which has an Ash'arite theological basis, it does not give any role to man and natural causes in the world system; And this is because of his belief in algebra. Allameh Tabataba'i has a Shiite view and for natural causes, not only did he not consider it roleless, but he also considered it a longitudinal role, and the longitudinal role is not algebra, and what is algebra is a transverse role; Therefore, wind, rain, and the like are natural causes that play the role of agents in the system of the universe and have no contradiction with monotheism. But Allameh Tabataba'i interprets monotheistic verses in the same way that he considers natural causes as longitudinal causes and considers them exactly in accordance with monotheism and is not opposed to the issue of monotheism. In this research, consciously or unconsciously, these two scientists, according to the influence of their theological principles, have adopted such two different methods for a subject. This article has studied the written works of Allameh Tabataba'i and Ibn Arabi in a library-documentary manner and has summarized the contents in the form of a partial comparative method according to the theological principles of relating natural causes to monotheistic verses
reza akbarian; hasan moradi; zahra rian
Abstract
Burhan-e Scddighin (the demonstration of the righteous) is a good sample of the philosophical questions. The analysis of its metamorphosis and development represents the profound thoughts of the Muslim philosophers in innovating and offering a subtle criterion for this argument and getting closer to ...
Read More
Burhan-e Scddighin (the demonstration of the righteous) is a good sample of the philosophical questions. The analysis of its metamorphosis and development represents the profound thoughts of the Muslim philosophers in innovating and offering a subtle criterion for this argument and getting closer to the religious injunctions or "God must be know» by God"; Buhran-c Seddighin. Avicenna's attempts were based on developing an argument according to the principles of ontology for not being in need of the principals of cosmology. Mulla Sadra holds that the arguments of Avicenna is not merely based on the principles of ontology since he has also taken advantage of spiritualism. The arguments of Sheikh c- Eshragh arc based on the principles of cosmology while the arguments of lbnc Arrabi's followers are according to the mystical contemplation of unity. Mulla Sadra's attempts have failed in giving a demonstration only based on the principles of ontology because his thought framework was limited to thinking about existence-essence; ontological thoughts. Allameh Tabataba'i has refuted this thought style or framework by setting up his demonstration of the righteous not according to the principles of ontology or cosmology but establishing it merely based on the rejection of the complaints and approval of the fundamental of the truth.