Quran and Quranic teachings
mohamad shabanpour
Abstract
The Holy Quran mentions many proofs to prove the existence of God and his uniqueness. This abundance and multiplicity of proofs have always been of interest to theologians and researchers of Quranic sciences, and for a long time, they have tried to classify the proofs based on their similarities and ...
Read More
The Holy Quran mentions many proofs to prove the existence of God and his uniqueness. This abundance and multiplicity of proofs have always been of interest to theologians and researchers of Quranic sciences, and for a long time, they have tried to classify the proofs based on their similarities and differences in order to overcome the multiplicity and ease of dealing with it. The classification of proofs of monotheism in the Qur'an into a) material proofs b) spiritual proofs c) and intuitive proofs used in verse 53 of Surah Fussilat. The present research is trying to answer these questions with a descriptive-analytical method: 1) Based on structural and thematic features, how can the large volume of these proofs in the Qur'an be classified? 2) Who are the real representatives and subgroups of each of these categories? 3) What are the effects of this classification and its real representatives? With the analysis done in this article, the total proofs of monotheism in the Qur'an were classified into three categories, then, twelve real representatives of them were categorized in a logical and completely Quranic way to make it easier to recognize the similarities and differences of the proofs and explain them. According to the findings of this research, the multiplicity of proofs is due to the multiplicity of middle limits, and the Qur'an has employed the middle limits and argued sometimes with the middle limit of «خلقکم» "Khalqakom" and sometimes with «یتوفاکم» "Yutofakom" and... sometimes with conjunction analogy and sometimes with exceptional analogy and... One of the effects of this diversity is to complete the proof for everyone, and the other is to give the mass of people and the middle levels of society the opportunity to easily understand the deep teachings of the Qur'an and provide the basis for understanding and dialogue.
mohamad shabanpour; fardin darabi
Abstract
n Ibn Arabi's view, which has an Ash'arite theological basis, it does not give any role to man and natural causes in the world system; And this is because of his belief in algebra. Allameh Tabataba'i has a Shiite view and for natural causes, not only did he not consider it roleless, but ...
Read More
n Ibn Arabi's view, which has an Ash'arite theological basis, it does not give any role to man and natural causes in the world system; And this is because of his belief in algebra. Allameh Tabataba'i has a Shiite view and for natural causes, not only did he not consider it roleless, but he also considered it a longitudinal role, and the longitudinal role is not algebra, and what is algebra is a transverse role; Therefore, wind, rain, and the like are natural causes that play the role of agents in the system of the universe and have no contradiction with monotheism. But Allameh Tabataba'i interprets monotheistic verses in the same way that he considers natural causes as longitudinal causes and considers them exactly in accordance with monotheism and is not opposed to the issue of monotheism. In this research, consciously or unconsciously, these two scientists, according to the influence of their theological principles, have adopted such two different methods for a subject. This article has studied the written works of Allameh Tabataba'i and Ibn Arabi in a library-documentary manner and has summarized the contents in the form of a partial comparative method according to the theological principles of relating natural causes to monotheistic verses
