amanallah naseri karimvand; mina shamkhi; abas musalaei; ghasem bostani
Abstract
Allameh Tabatabai's views have been widely reflected and have had a significant impact on contemporary Shiite Quranic works. Of course, contemporary Shiite commentators, in addition to widely using the views of the author of Al-Mizan, have also examined and criticized his views in significant ...
Read More
Allameh Tabatabai's views have been widely reflected and have had a significant impact on contemporary Shiite Quranic works. Of course, contemporary Shiite commentators, in addition to widely using the views of the author of Al-Mizan, have also examined and criticized his views in significant cases. Leading research that has been done by descriptiveanalytical method and using library tools, by studying contemporary interpretive works, explores and extracts the arguments of commentators in criticizing the views of Al-Mizan author (about the verses of Surah AlBaqarah) and evaluates them. Some commentators have criticized Allameh's views in cases such as: what are the syllables, discovering the meanings of Quranic words, determining the instances of Quranic words and phrases, explaining the meaning and contents of verses. The most important reasons cited by critics are: vague reading, know the opposite, incompatibility with Qur'anic sources and narration, consider weak and invalid, incorrect and unprovable, contradiction with the meaning of verses, incompatibility with Qur'anic evidences and verses, lack of meaning of the verse on interpretation, etc. after reviewing and evaluating the opinions of critics, the results of the research show that most of these criticisms are invalid and face major harms and problems. Of course, in a few cases, the opinions of critics are correct and valid, and the weakness of Allameh's views is accepted. Of course, in a few cases, the opinions of the critics are valid and the weakness of Allameh's views is accepted
amanallah naseri karimvand; abas musalaei; sayed ali asadi
Abstract
This research, after studying interpretation of Al-Mizan's and examining how Allameh Tabatabai's views on the views of the authors of Al-Manar are written in a descriptive-analytical way and with the aim of discovering the principles and criteria of Allameh Tabatabai's criticism of Interpretation of ...
Read More
This research, after studying interpretation of Al-Mizan's and examining how Allameh Tabatabai's views on the views of the authors of Al-Manar are written in a descriptive-analytical way and with the aim of discovering the principles and criteria of Allameh Tabatabai's criticism of Interpretation of Al-Manar's.The importance and validity interpretation of al-Manar's on the one hand, and the extensive criticism Allameh toward this interpretation on the other hand, led to the question, on what basis and for what reason, did the author of al-Mizan examine and criticize the views of the authors of this interpretation? That the author has extracted, categorized, expressed with research throughout of interpretation of al-Mizan components and criteria of Allameh Tabatabai in criticism of views the authors of Al-Manar, and has cited examples of the verses below that criticize the views of al-Manar's authors as an example.Conclusion: Allameh Tabatabai most important reasons and principles for criticizing the views of the authors of Al-Manar can be: inadequate knowledge of the authors of Al-Manar's interpretation of the principles of interpretation, disregard for the style of the verses and thematic interpretation, baseless and unreasonable comments, Inability and weakness to cite and use narrativesand their inconsistency with Farragin's correct narratives, fanatical view with the default and opposite of theQuran, weakness in using Arabic literature(misidentification of correct letters, pronouns, etc.), incorrect semantics of the words and meanings of theQuranic verses, misidentification correct of the audience of the Quranic verses and instances expressed as opposed to certain religious teachings and etc.
