hosein sharifi; Hossein badri; elahe bashtani ranjioor
Abstract
Criticism and rationalization in the teachings of religions are the questions affecting mankind, and among them, the doctrine of sacrifice, according to which human beings must pay a ransom and damages for the sin of Abu al-Bashar Adam, and this damage was paid with the suffering and death of Christ ...
Read More
Criticism and rationalization in the teachings of religions are the questions affecting mankind, and among them, the doctrine of sacrifice, according to which human beings must pay a ransom and damages for the sin of Abu al-Bashar Adam, and this damage was paid with the suffering and death of Christ (PBUH), is one of the issues that have been faced with challenges in the understanding and rationality of modern man, and it is challenging in contemporary Christianity. Since the Qur'an, as an eternal miracle in the universe, is a unique standard and yardstick for the degree of justifiability and correctness of the teachings of religions, especially those religions that were not spared from the hands of the distorters, the present article aims to examine and measure the doctrine from the perspective of the Holy Quran and use the related verses for deliberation and reflection in a descriptive-analytical way. The result of the research shows that the Holy Qur'an together with the Islamic traditions never confirms this belief, and invalidates the issue of redemption by emphasizing the infallibility of Adam (PBUH) and other prophets, specifying the ascension of Jesus (PBUH) before the cross, considering everyone responsible for his own fate, and also introducing the actions of a person as the criterion for his salvation
Ahmad zarnegar; seyede zeinab Hosseini; Roohallah MohamadAlinejadOmran
Abstract
AbstractThis study has been written after studying the opinions of those who believe in the Qur'an and the alphabet and examining how these two opinions interact with each other, in a descriptive-analytical manner with the aim of discovering the principles and criteria of the opinions about the confiscation ...
Read More
AbstractThis study has been written after studying the opinions of those who believe in the Qur'an and the alphabet and examining how these two opinions interact with each other, in a descriptive-analytical manner with the aim of discovering the principles and criteria of the opinions about the confiscation and ijtihad of the Qur'anic script. The importance of drawing and recording the Qur'an, on the other hand, and examining and criticizing the arguments of those who believe in the seizure or ijtihad of the Qur'anic tradition, raised the question of what principles and arguments the two groups in question express their views on? And what is the preferred opinion?Belief in the confiscation or ijtihad of the Qur'anic Qur'an is one of the most important issues in the field of Qur'anic studies. Those who believe in the prohibition of the Mus'haf tradition consider any change in the way the Qur'anic Mus'hafs are written as unauthorized and as a distortion of the words of the Qur'an, and for this purpose, they cite evidence. In contrast, there is the theory of ijtihad of the Qur'anic script, which in order to facilitate the reading of non-Arabic languages, especially for beginners, allows a change in the script and suggests writing the Qur'an based on the deductive pattern. Examining the theoretical foundations and criticizing and analyzing the arguments presented shows the lack of authenticity of the confiscation of the Mus'haf tradition
