abdolali shokr; Hadi Obidavi; yusuf farshadnia
Abstract
The attribution of "child" and "birth" to God is a historical notion that the Qur'an has criticized and challenged in various ways. On the other hand, believing in this doctrine includes accessories that are in opposition to the pure teachings of monotheism. The present article, with a descriptive and ...
Read More
The attribution of "child" and "birth" to God is a historical notion that the Qur'an has criticized and challenged in various ways. On the other hand, believing in this doctrine includes accessories that are in opposition to the pure teachings of monotheism. The present article, with a descriptive and analytical approach, examines the historical course and tools of belief in "birth" based on Quranic verses as well as narrative confirmations. The results indicate that the Qur'an denies this doctrine by mentioning attributes such as true owner, omnipotent, and purity from imperfections for God. "Birth" according to the mechanism of "leaving my object" objects such as; The previous presence of the child in the essence of the parent and its eternity to the eternity of the parent, the multiplicity, multiplicity, and multiplicity of gods along with the multiplicity of births, the existence of intercession, the limitation of God's power, the existence of existence, the non-fulfillment of evil, despair of the parent and negation of prayer. It follows the duality and negation of the miracle. In contrast, the Quranic doctrine of "inventing" and "creating without me an object" such as; The absence of the creature in the essence of the Creator and its occurrence, lack of similarity, monotheism and oneness, the negation of intercession and means, infinite power, negation of the law of conservation, the realization of evil, prayer, negation of duality and proof of monotheism and proof of miracles.
