nabiyollah sadrifar; mohamad reza zamiri; mohamad molavi
Abstract
The tradition of change" in the verse Oإِنَّ اللَّهَ لا یغَیِّرُ ما بِقَوْمٍ حَتَّی یغَیِّرُوا مَا بِأَنْفُسِهِمْP has been mentioned and has always been of interest to social commentators in contemporary times. This paper tries to compare ...
Read More
The tradition of change" in the verse Oإِنَّ اللَّهَ لا یغَیِّرُ ما بِقَوْمٍ حَتَّی یغَیِّرُوا مَا بِأَنْفُسِهِمْP has been mentioned and has always been of interest to social commentators in contemporary times. This paper tries to compare the viewpoint of social commentators with the descriptive-analytical method while explaining the exact "tradition of change" based on the eleventh verse of Rā'ud's sura. Reviews reveal that the precise definition of the "tradition of change" is based on an interpretation that is presented about. There are two perspectives on this: first, the "we" of the first principle of "blessing" and "us" of the second principle returns to "relative", hence the tradition of changing "from a desirable to an undesirable" meaning. In the second view, "us" of the first principle of "blessing" and "us," the second principle, is meant to be "relative and return of suffering", hence the meaning of the tradition of change as "transformation from desirable to unfavorable and viceTherefore, in explaining the verse, the first group refers to this verse with verse 53 of the Anfal and has given a special meaning, but the second group has provided a general and extraterrestrial meaning of the verse. The results show that the second viewpoint and approach are more precise, because in the extraction of a verse from the verse there are many important fruits, including: the discovery of the social laws of the Qur'an, the question of the Qur'an, the referral of the community to social problems, and the observation of.
