Saeid Ghafarallahi; Aliahmad Naseh; Reza Moaddab
Abstract
Quran is a text that needs to be interpreted for its intentions to be understood. After understanding these intentions, using them for the purpose of human guidance in the process of adaption (Tatbīq) is in order. The question is how can one grasp these intentions from the text of the Quran and then ...
Read More
Quran is a text that needs to be interpreted for its intentions to be understood. After understanding these intentions, using them for the purpose of human guidance in the process of adaption (Tatbīq) is in order. The question is how can one grasp these intentions from the text of the Quran and then perform the process of adaption. Analyzing the process of interpretation leads to the following conclusions: As text could be written or non-written, the concept of frameworks of interpretation (maqāmāt tafsīrī) is put forward and Understanding the meaning is only possible in one of these frameworks. These frameworks are: apparent signification (sībāq), the occasion and environment of revelation of verse, context (sīyāq), the occasion and environment of revelation of chapters, written discourse of Quran in written discourse of Quran, and spoken discourse of Quran in spoken discourse of Quran. There is no conflict between these frameworks and to achieve the interpretation of a verse in its entirety, we need to study all of these frameworks. Analyzing the process of adaption leads to the following conclusions: The scope of this process is all verses. This process is different from the process of interpretation and is done with relationship and aim. This process is performed at one modus ponens and in conflict of recipients with apparent signification or the occasion and environment of revelation of one verse. This adaption is acceptable when there is no conflict between the adaption of one verse and the frameworks of interpretation in other verses.
Quran and Quranic teachings
farideh pishvaei; sayd mahmood tayeb hosainy; mohammad arabsahehi; fatemeh ghanbari.
Abstract
Associate Professor, Department of Religious Logic and Understanding at Islamic Culture and Thought Institute
One of the foundations of Amin Khouli’s literary interpretation theory is Neo-I’tizizali thoughts. This paper, using an analytical-critical approach based on documentary data, in ...
Read More
Associate Professor, Department of Religious Logic and Understanding at Islamic Culture and Thought Institute
One of the foundations of Amin Khouli’s literary interpretation theory is Neo-I’tizizali thoughts. This paper, using an analytical-critical approach based on documentary data, in addition to the introduction of Khuoli’s theory, has revealed and criticized the framework of the Neo-I’tizizali’s thought in Khouli’s theory, which has been effective in his later interpretive approaches. One of the advantages of the Khouli’s Neo-I’tizizali principle is the social interpretation approach of his theory. In contrast, due to the inherent shortcomings of this thought, some challenges have been made including the innovative view in all dimensions of religion, the disconnection with the interpretive tradition, the relative understanding of the Quran and the dominance of the text centrality in the interpretation. Also, the lack of a revelatory look on mind is one of the problems of this theory. In addition, the extremist attention to understanding of the primary audience and the ignorance of the Quran’s culturaliztion would lead to inclination towards cultural interpretation. The foundations of the Khouli’s Neo-I’tizizali theory such as lack of expurgation in textual understanding principles and explaining the worldview have made it subjective-oriented. In this view, regardless of its divine aspect, the Quran as an animated text was the subject of the current investigation; therefore, its revelatory identity was denied. The Khouli’s theory has not been secure from this problem, and this is observed in the works of students and researchers relying on his theory.
kavous roohi; ص م
Abstract
In the field of “Maad”, there are many words (28 words) that only 17 cases are used in this field. This article, has examined meaning of these words and common points and Conceptual differences between them from valid Arabic dictionary and commentators' views And concluded that Each of these ...
Read More
In the field of “Maad”, there are many words (28 words) that only 17 cases are used in this field. This article, has examined meaning of these words and common points and Conceptual differences between them from valid Arabic dictionary and commentators' views And concluded that Each of these words in this area have share semantic with other words And because of that put in the Qur'anic likes (nazayer) While not found in the Vojoh and Nazayer book. and so some words have special meaning that cant replace them with their likes (nazayer) due to the vers conception is attachment of most of this words to meccan chapters that is associated with the concept of madani chapters.نتیجه مهم دیگر تعلق غالب واژگان حوزۀ معاد به سور مکی است که مرتبط با محتوای سور مکی می باشد. نتیجه مهم دیگر تعلق غالب واژگان حوزۀ معاد به سور مکی است که مرتبط با محتوای سور مکی می باشد.
Hamzeh Ali Bahrami; مجتبی سپاهی
Abstract
One of the literary and miraculous qualities of the Quran is the permissible occurrence in the Quran. The principle of the permissible occurrence in the Quran is accepted by the majority of the scholars of Islam and has written many books on this subject. Among these, Ibn Taymiyyah Harani (d. 728 AH) ...
Read More
One of the literary and miraculous qualities of the Quran is the permissible occurrence in the Quran. The principle of the permissible occurrence in the Quran is accepted by the majority of the scholars of Islam and has written many books on this subject. Among these, Ibn Taymiyyah Harani (d. 728 AH) as the most prominent theorist of the Salafist-Takfiri-Wahhabi regime denies the possibility of occurrence in the Quran. Ibn Taymiyyah, as one of the founders of the Takfiri movement and his ideas, are accepted by this cult Therefore, knowledge of Ibn Taymiyyah's thoughts really is knowledge of this cult . This paper, by using analytical method, seeks to answer the question of what Ibn Taymiyya's view about permissible is? and how strong is His arguments? By looking at his works, it is concluded that Ibn Taymiyya's arguments in denying the permissible occurrences of the Quran are unacceptable. These arguments are critically and seriously controversial, and acceptance of his view will deprive the miracles and the delicacy of the Quran.
Naser Kolivand; Nosrat Nilsaz
Abstract
Visualization theory, which is used to explain the determination of the quality and howness of rewarding and punishment of human beings‘ deeds, shows the reality of human deeds in the hereafter. According to many scholars and commentators besides rational arguments, there exist ample anecdotal ...
Read More
Visualization theory, which is used to explain the determination of the quality and howness of rewarding and punishment of human beings‘ deeds, shows the reality of human deeds in the hereafter. According to many scholars and commentators besides rational arguments, there exist ample anecdotal evidence to support this theory. 95 verses of the Quran alluded to the visualization of deeds. According to their different literary structures, these verses are divided into multiple categories. A group of these verses with different interpretaions and terminology such as the visualizations of deeds, the presence of deeds, the examination of deeds explicitly emphasize the visualizaions of deeds in the hereafter. The other special syntactic structures such as denial of questioning, arrest, and criminal deeds in the hereafter denote to the reality of occuring such procedures. The third set of signs with multiple imaging in the form of simile or metaphor such as metaphors for considering good deeds and acts of believers as light and regarding unbelievers‘ deeds as mirage and darkness portrayed.the innate nature of some of the deeds. This article examineed the literary structures and interpretations in the Quran that could provide evidence in support of the theory deeds‘ visualization.
mohamad hoseyn bayat
Abstract
This paper focuses on IbnArabi'sperspective on the interpretation of the fourth verse of the holy chapter 'Prohibition'. It examines IbnArabi's attitude, as expressed in his famous work, towards the character of Aisha, Hafsa and their fathers, and has illustrated that IbnArabi has gone too far in admiring ...
Read More
This paper focuses on IbnArabi'sperspective on the interpretation of the fourth verse of the holy chapter 'Prohibition'. It examines IbnArabi's attitude, as expressed in his famous work, towards the character of Aisha, Hafsa and their fathers, and has illustrated that IbnArabi has gone too far in admiring these characters, such that he has regarded their vices as their virtues;compared to all other Islamic interpreters, IbnArabihas held a completely divergent view on these people. His mistakes in admiring them and in interpreting the fourth verse of 'Prohibition' are substantiated in this paper, and consequently, not only this fourth verse, but the whole chapter, is deemed as an evidence of Aisha's and Hafsa'sdisobedience and rebel.
