Analysis and critique of ontology and the scope of application of reason In the Qur'anic views of the later sects

Arabsahehi, Mohammad; Pishvaei, Farideh

doi:10.22054/rjqk.2022.66323.2553

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Islamic research institute for culture and thought, Tehran. iran

² Level 4 Comparative Interpretation, Masoumiyah Seminary Higher Education Institute, Qom, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/rjqk.2022.66323.2553

Abstract

"Late separatists" means the current followers of this current of thought, compared to the earlier separatists, have changed their approach to the scope of application of reason in understanding the Qur'an and give more functions to reason. The present article has examined this issue in the Quranic opinions of the late Malekimianji, Tehrani, Hakimi and Mr. Seydan.
The results of this study, which is based on descriptive-analytical method based on library information, show that later separatists, while stubbornly opposing philosophical reason in its specific meaning, accepted their reason with distinct titles such as innate intellect (enlightened intellect). , Introduce religious and essential self-foundationTo show its difference with the philosophical intellect, but in fact, their preferred intellect is the analytical intellect or the intellect of the evidence of axioms, and in the form of logical propositions, referring generalities and absolutes to the specifics and constraints and understanding the Qur'an with connected and discrete evidences Has emerged. This hypothesis also proves that although later separatists valued reason somewhat than their predecessors As a result, this current of thought, based on its preconceived notion among the sources of interpretation, has limited the hand of philosophical reason from the circle of understanding the deep meanings of the Qur'an and typically to the apparent levels of the meaning of the verses. A comparison of his Qur'anic view with rationalist interpretations is evidence of this claim.

Keywords

References

Abi-Dawood, Suleiman (1999). Sunan Abi-Dawood. Riyadh: Al-Afkar International Publishing and Distribution House.

Azad, Alireza; and Masoudi, Jahangir (2012). Quran Exegesis and classis hermeneutics, Volume 1, Qom: Bustan-e Ketab.

Ahmad, Mohammadsalem (2009). Rational Islam; Renewal of religious thought according to Amin Khouli, Cairo: Ru’yat Publishing and Distribution.

Izutsu, Toshihiko (1995). God and man in Quran. Translated by Ahmad Aram. Tehran, Farhang Publication, 5^th edition.

Pakatchi, Ahmad (2012). History of exegesis of Holy Quran, 1^st edition, Tehran: Imam Sadegh University

Javadi Amoli, Abdollah (2011). Tasnim, Qom: Esra, 1^st edition.

_____________, (2007). Status of wisdom in the geometry of religious knowledge. Qom: Esra.

_____________ (1993). Sharia in the Mirror of Knowledge, 1^st edition, Qom, Raja Cultural publication.

Khalfollah, Mohammadahmad (1999). Al-fan al-Qesasi fi al-Quran al-Karim (art of storytelling in Holy Quran). Beirut: Sina Arabic Publication.

______________________ (1982). Al-Quran wa Mushkilat Hayatina al-Moaser (Quran and the problems of out contemporary life). Beirut: Arabic Institution for research and publication, 1^st edition.

Khouli, Amin (1987). Min Hadi al-Quran fi Ramadan (From guidance of Quran in Ramadan) unknown, Cairo: The General Egyptian Book Committee.

___________ (1996a). Kitab al-Kheir (the good book), unknown, Cairo: unknown.

___________ (1961). Minhaj Tajdid fi al-Nahv wa al-Balaqa wa al-Tafsir wa al-Adab (Methods of renewal in grammar, rhetoric, interpretation and literature), Beirut: Dar al-Ma’refat (house of knowledge)

___________ (1996b). Derasat al-Islamyiah (Islamic teachings). Cairo: Egyptian library of Cairo.

Rafaei, Aboljabbar (2019). Invitation of Shikh Amin Al-Khouli to Renewal. Unknown, Afkar Center for Studies and Research.

Rumi, Fahd ibn Abdolrahman (1987). Itihajat al-tafsir fi al-qarn al-rabe ashar (Interpretation trends in the fourteenth century), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Departments of scientific research, fatwa, advocacy and guidance.

Soroush, Abdolkarim (2001). Ethics of Gods, Tehran, Tarh-e No.

Sobhani, Jafar (2011). Manahij al-tafsiriyah fi Ulum al-Quran (Exegetical Methods in the Sciences of the Quran), Qom: Imam Sadegh Institute.

Sharqah, Zafersaeid (2014). Nahj al-E’tezal fi al-Etejahat al-Fekriyeh al-Moasr (The approach of abstinence in the contemporary intellectual trends). Riyadh, Dar Alwaei for Publishing and Distribution, 2^nd edition.

Arabsalehi, Mohammad (2014). Collection of articles on rheology and critique of neo- abstinence, Interview with Dr. Ghaeminia and Khosrowpanah, 1^st edition. Tehran: Islamic culture and though research center.

Qiam, Omarhassan (1981). Literary text of Quran. Beirut: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Cabanis, Jean Louis (1982). Literary criticism and humanities. Translated by Fahd Alam. Damascus, Dar al-Fekr.

Majlesi, Mohammadbagher (1983). Bahar al-Anvar. Beirut: Al-Vafa institute, 2^nd edition.

Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammadtaghi (2007). Multiplicity of readings, research and composition by Gholamali Azizikia, 3^rd edition. Qom: Imam Khomeini institute.

Vasfi, Mohammadreza (2008). Conversation with Nasrhamed Abu-zayd. Abed al-Jabbari. Mohammad Arkoun and Hasan Hanafi. Tehran: Negah-e Mo’aser.

Yousefi Eshkevari, Hasan (1999). Critique and review of contemporary Islamic movement, 2^nd edition. Tehran: Ghasideh.

Abniki, Hasan (2008). Literary criticism. Essence and application of literary hermeneutic. Literary Criticism, No.2.

Abu-zayd, Nasrhamed (2013). Literary approach to Quran. History. Outcomes and difficulties. Translated by Mehrdad Abbasi. Ayeneh Pajouhesh. No. 142.

Ahmad, Mohammadsalem (2004). Derasat al-Quraniyeh. Al-Tafsir al-Adabi al-Quran end-al-Sheikh Amin Kholi (Quran teachings. Literary exegesis of Quran by Sheikh Amin Khouli). Al-va’ei Islami. No. 467.

Amiri, Zahra; Hosseini, Seyyed Mohammadbagher (2016). Possibility of denominating Quran by text based on the modern definition in contemporary theories. Qayyem books. No. 14.

Tavkkolibina, Meysam (2012). “Religious texts, from holy to literary; macro-method of contemporary literary studies regarding holy texts”. Qabasat. No. 66.

Jamei Salami, Abdolrahman ibn Raja (2009). Al-Nas al-Qurani fi Manzour al-Derasat al-Adabi; Al-moqef wa al-Monhej (The Quranic text in the studies of literary perspective; Attitude and method), Al-derasat al-Loghaviyeh wa al-Adabiyeh, No. 1.

Khouli, Amin (2011). “Translation of Tafsir entry in the Islamic Encyclopedia”. Samaneh Moradpour. Ketab-e Mah-e Din. No. 164.

Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammadali and Momennejad (2015). Abolhasan. “Historical exegesis of Holy Quran. Quran wa Elm. No. 16.

Rafaei, Abdoljabbar (2017). “Sheikh Amin Khouli, the pioneer of the hermeneutic studies in Arabic”. Al-hayat al-Tayyebah. No. 37.

Roland Bathes (1994). “From work to text”. Translated by Morad Farhadpour. Arghanoun, No. 4.

Reshad, Aliakbar (2014). “A discourse from Ayatollah Aliakbar Reshad; deficiencies of neo-abstinence movement”. Zamaneh. No. 128 & 129.

Soroush, Abdolkarim (2007). “Mohammad is the creator of Quran”. Baztab-e Andisheh. No. 96.

Savari, Aziz; and Salar, Sahebeh (2016). “Review of challenges in religious education and offering solutions for its modification from the perspective of contemporary neo-abstinence”. Proceedings of the seventh national conference of philosophy of teaching and education of Iran association. No. 30 & 31.

Shaker, Mohammadkazem (2010). “Exegesis based on order of revelation with three readings”. Quranic studies. No. 62 & 63.

Shamis, Abdel Moneim (1980). “Brilliant thoughts and fragrant remembrance of Sheikh Amin Al-Khouli”. Al-Jadid. No. 197.

Doqamin, Ziyad (1999). “Features of renewal in the Afghani thought in dealing with the Holy Quran and its impact on the method of interpretation in the modern era”. Qazaya al-Islamiyeh Mo’aser Journal. No. 6.

Abdolhamid, Yones (1966). “Amin Khouli the great pioneer”. Al-Adab. No. 1 & 2.

Abdollatif, Ahmad (1966). “Amin Khouli, Life of Amin Khouli Art of Speech”. Al-Ketab Al-Arabi. No. 35.

Araabsalehi, Mohammad (2008). “Historicism and religion”. Qasabat. No. 50.

Aghili, Alireza (1996). “Status and application of intellect in four exegeses of the past centure”. Quranic studies, No. 7-8.

Ayyad,Shokri (1966). “Amin Khouli”; Al-Majaleh, No. 112.

Qollab, Abdolkarim (1966). “The revolutionary Sheikh Amin Al-Khouli”, Al-Adab. No 1 & 2.

Mottaqi, Saeid (2017). “Old abstinence and neo-abstinence”. Al-manhaj. No. 80.

Mirzad Babazadeh, Behnam; and Adineh Khojastepour (2015). “Different reading of classic Persian texts in light in new historicism”. Literary textology. No. 53.

Naghibzadeh, Mohammad (2009). “Role of Quran in Arabic Literature and its exclusion among literary scholars”. Quranshenakht. No. 3.

Vaezi, Ahmad (2012) “Criticism of composition of Nasrhamed Abu Zayd about historicity of Quran”. Quranshenakht, 3(2).

Hermas, Abdolrazzagh ibn Ismail (2002). “The science of interpretation in the writings of orientalists”. Umm Al-Qura Association for Sharia Sciences and Arabic Language and Literature. No. 25.

Gokkir, Necmettin (2014). Western challenges and Muslim hermeneutical responses. Usual Islamaic Studies Journal, 22.

Unknown, Neo-abstinence. Rationalism based on abstinence thought. https://hawzah.net 2020/05/18

Mirzaei, Mohammadali. Inattention to Hadith and crossing Sunna as important indicators of neo-abstinence. https://www.mehrnews.com/news3745508 2016/09/19

‌

‌‌استناد به این مقاله: عرب صالحی، محمد (خداخواست).، پیشوایی، فریده. (1400). تحلیل و نقد هستی‌شناسی و گستره کاربرد عقل در آراء قرآنی تفکیکان متاخر، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشنامه معارف قرآنی، 13(48)، 31-64.

DOI: 10.22054/RJQK.2022.66323.2553

Quranic Knowledge Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Analysis and critique of ontology and the scope of application of reason In the Qur'anic views of the later sects

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 48March 2021Pages 31-64

Volume 13, Issue 48
March 2021
Pages 31-64