Zohreh Shariatnaseri; nasrin kordnejad
Abstract
The study of interpretations of different periods shows that commentators have had different functions in the field of application of interpretive sources. The question of present article is how to use narration as one of the interpretive sources in the interpretation of the contemporary period and has ...
Read More
The study of interpretations of different periods shows that commentators have had different functions in the field of application of interpretive sources. The question of present article is how to use narration as one of the interpretive sources in the interpretation of the contemporary period and has reached some results. This descriptive-analytical study has turned the discussion into interpretations of the contemporary period. The result of this study showed that the method of contemporary commentators in using narrations has sometimes been the opposite of previous commentators, so that contemporaries have either not narrated some narrations, or in the face of narration with context (lip and verbal reason) with narration They have criticized the document and its signification and commented on the rejection and design of the narration. In a few cases, the narration has taken precedence over the context
Saeid Ghafarallahi; Aliahmad Naseh; Reza Moaddab
Abstract
Quran is a text that needs to be interpreted for its intentions to be understood. After understanding these intentions, using them for the purpose of human guidance in the process of adaption (Tatbīq) is in order. The question is how can one grasp these intentions from the text of the Quran and then ...
Read More
Quran is a text that needs to be interpreted for its intentions to be understood. After understanding these intentions, using them for the purpose of human guidance in the process of adaption (Tatbīq) is in order. The question is how can one grasp these intentions from the text of the Quran and then perform the process of adaption. Analyzing the process of interpretation leads to the following conclusions: As text could be written or non-written, the concept of frameworks of interpretation (maqāmāt tafsīrī) is put forward and Understanding the meaning is only possible in one of these frameworks. These frameworks are: apparent signification (sībāq), the occasion and environment of revelation of verse, context (sīyāq), the occasion and environment of revelation of chapters, written discourse of Quran in written discourse of Quran, and spoken discourse of Quran in spoken discourse of Quran. There is no conflict between these frameworks and to achieve the interpretation of a verse in its entirety, we need to study all of these frameworks. Analyzing the process of adaption leads to the following conclusions: The scope of this process is all verses. This process is different from the process of interpretation and is done with relationship and aim. This process is performed at one modus ponens and in conflict of recipients with apparent signification or the occasion and environment of revelation of one verse. This adaption is acceptable when there is no conflict between the adaption of one verse and the frameworks of interpretation in other verses.
cobra rastgoo
Abstract
Variation in its various forms in the Arabic language of the Qur'an, as a linguistic tool, has created a varied structure in this heavenly text that traditional rhetorical topics alone cannot derive from its aesthetic aspects and exhibit methodical and systematically the semantic implications of this ...
Read More
Variation in its various forms in the Arabic language of the Qur'an, as a linguistic tool, has created a varied structure in this heavenly text that traditional rhetorical topics alone cannot derive from its aesthetic aspects and exhibit methodical and systematically the semantic implications of this phenomenon. Therefore it is necessary to apply a fundamentally structured theory which, unlike classical rhetoric, does not attach much importance to linguistic representation, in studying this remarkable linguistic industry and unveiling the profound meanings behind it. Accordingly, this paper, relying on the context and Semantic component model in modern linguistic studies and using descriptive-analytic (causal) method, seeks to prove scientifically and practically the factors influencing the use of Variation structure as an important linguistic tool and grammatical heterogeneity in the miraculous expression of the Qur'an. Examination of the Qur'anic data shows that this phenomenon is influenced by contextual and textual as well as semantic vocabulary units by creating artistic ambiguity, interpretive, motivational (syntactic) function, compression, concealment, decorative and thematic relevance in the text. As we examine the application of this tool, especially the male form of the male on the Qur'anic propositions, it can be justified by the theory of masculine neutrality in the case of both male and female in Arabic grammar. As well as examining the application of all forms of this deception to Qur'anic propositions, it can be justified by the theory of noun neutralization if applied to several different formulas in Arabic grammar.
Zohreh Ghorbanimadavani
Abstract
One of the most important and fundamental interpretations of cognitive linguistics is the form and context in which many linguistic interpretations can be identified, or help in the formulation of words. The context is what more important in the texture of the sentence, and the shape is considered the ...
Read More
One of the most important and fundamental interpretations of cognitive linguistics is the form and context in which many linguistic interpretations can be identified, or help in the formulation of words. The context is what more important in the texture of the sentence, and the shape is considered the same texture and The phrase. There are many verses in the Quran that end in several names of God in a special order. One of these arranges is the arrangement of the two names "Aziz" and "Hakim". These two names are mentioned in 45 verses from the Qur'an that "Aziz" is initially and "Hakim" is mentioned afterwards. By examining all these verses and using a descriptive-analytical method and based on the activity of the form and the field, it became clear that according to the text of the verses, the name "Aziz" is more important. Hence, it is considered as "the context " at the beginning, and the name "Hakim" is overshadowed by it as "form", and emphasizes that God's lordship is accompanied by two important principles: one is dignity and another He is his wisdom, and he is a mighty and dear god, whose works are wisdom and wisdom.
