نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University

2 Associate professor in Quran & hadith at shahed University

چکیده

The importance and role of contextual clues in achieving an accurate and valid interpretation of the Holy Quran is a fundamental topic that has consistently attracted the attention of researchers in the field of Quranic sciences. Interpretive clues, as efficient tools, play a vital role in understanding the profound meaning and real intent of the verses and are divided into two general categories: "Verbal" (Maqālīyah) and "Circumstantial" (Ḥālīyah). Paying attention to these clues is an important criterion for evaluating the validity and accuracy of Quranic commentaries, because accurate and correct use of them can lead to a better understanding of the context and circumstances of the revelation of the verses. The contextual clue of "Maqām" (Situation) is one of the valuable clues that has received less direct attention in commentaries. This clue can be understood from the exigency of speech and the atmosphere governing the discourse, and it helps the commentator to find the precise meaning of the verses and link it to the temporal and spatial circumstances. Allamah Ṭabāṭabāʼī is among the commentators who, in al-Mīzān commentary, have extensively used the contextual clue of Maqām to deepen the understanding of the verses. This approach has enabled him to look at the verses from a new perspective in various fields, including literary and linguistic discussions, Quranic sciences, traditions, and specialized issues of interpretation, and sometimes to critique prevailing views. The application of the contextual clue of Maqām in al-Mīzān commentary has not only led to a new understanding of the verses, but has sometimes led to the rejection or correction of some traditional interpretations. The present study, using a descriptive-analytical method, aims to examine the frequency of use of the Maqām clue and the extent of its impact on the interpretation of Quranic verses in al-Mīzān, in order to reveal the different roles that this clue plays in various interpretive fields and, on the other hand, to reveal its importance in a more accurate and better understanding of the verses of the Quran.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The role and position of the relative "Maqam" from the perspective of Allama Tabataba'i in the interpretation of al-Mizan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Safari 1
  • hasan Asgharpour 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University

2 Associate professor in Quran & hadith at shahed University

چکیده [English]

significance and role of "contextual indicators" in the accurate and precise interpretation of the Quran is well-recognized among researchers in the field of Quranic exegesis. These contextual indicators are divided into two categories: "textual" and "situational." Undoubtedly, one of the criteria for evaluating the accuracy of Quranic interpretations is the extent to which these indicators are considered in the exegesis of the Quran. The "context" indicator is one such interpretive tool that has been utilized by only a few exegetes. This indicator is identified from the context of the discourse and the exigencies of the speech. Allameh Tabatabai extensively employed this indicator in his interpretive understanding of Quranic verses. The scope of the "context" indicator's role in the interpretation of Al-Mizan extends to various domains including literary-linguistic aspects, Quranic sciences, Hadith studies, and specialized exegesis discussions. The use of the "context" indicator in Al-Mizan's exegesis sometimes leads to a novel understanding of Quranic verses and at other times to the critique of prevailing interpretive views. This study, using a descriptive-analytical method, attempts to reveal the frequency and scope of the application of this indicator in understanding Quranic verses in the exegesis of Al-Mizan.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • علّامه طباطبائی
  • تفسیر المیزان
  • قرائن تفسیری
  • قرینۀ مقام
The Holy Quran
Ibn Āshūr, M. (1999 AD/1420 AH). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Beirut: Mu'assasat al-Tarikh al-Arabi.
Ibn Qutaybah Dīnawarī, A. (1973 AD/1393 AH). Taʼwīl Mushkil al-Qurʼān. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-'Ilmiyya.
Ibn Nadīm, M. (2011 AD/1430 AH). al-Fihrist. (Ayman, F. Ed). London: Mu'assasat al-Furqan lil-Turath al-Islami.
Ibn Hishām Anṣārī, J. (1964 AD/1384 AH). Mughnī al-Labīb ʻan al-Kutub al-Aʻārīb. (Mubarak, M; Hamad Allah, M; Afghani, S. Ed) Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
Abū ʻAlī Fārsī, H. (1993 AD/1413 AH). al-Ḥujjah lil-Qurrāʼ al-Sabʻah. (Jawijati, B; Qahwaji, B; Daqqaq, A; Rabbah, A. ED). 2nd Edition. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'mun lil-Turath.
Babaei, A; Azizi Kia, G; Rouhani Rad, M. (2006 AD/1385 SH). Methodology of Quranic Interpretation. 2nd Edition. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah & University and Samt.
Bāqillānī, A. (1954 AD/1374 AH). Iʻjāz al-Qurʼān. (Saqr, A. Ed). Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif.
Badrī, T. (2007 AD/1428 AH). Muʻjam Mufradāt Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Muqāran. Tehran.
Thaʻlabī Niyshabūrī, A. (2001 AD/1422 AH). al-Kashf wa al-Bayān. (Ibn Ashur, A. Ed). Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi.
Ḥāzim Qarṭājannī Āndalusī, A. (1986 AD). Minhāj al-Bulaghāʼ wa Sirāj al-Udabāʼ. (Ibn Khoja, M . Ed). 3rd Edition. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb.
Al-Ḥasnāwī, M. (2000 AD/1421 AH). al-Fāṣilah fī al-Qurʼān. 2nd Edition. Amman: Dar Ammar.
Ḥaqqī Burusawī, I. (1994 AD/1414 AH). Tafsīr Rūḥ al-Bayān. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ḥaqqī, M. (2004 AD/1425 AH). ʻUlūm al-Qurʼān min Khilāl Muqaddamāt al- Tafsīr. Beirut: Mu'assasat al-Risala.
Khiḍr, A. (2011 AD/1430 AH). Fawāsil al-Āyāt al-Qurʼānīyyah; Dirāsah Balāghīyyah Dalālīyyah. 2nd Edition. Cairo: Maktabat al-Adab.
Rajabi, M. (1383 SH/2004 AD). Method of Interpreting the Qur'an. 1st Edition. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University.
Zajjāj, I. (1996 AD/1416 AH). Iʻrāb al-Qurʼān. (Abyari, I . Ed). 3rd Edition. Qom: Dar al-Tafsir.
Zarkashī, B. (1990 AD/1410 AH). al-Burhān fī ʻUlūm al-Qurʼān. (Marashli, Y; Dhahabi, J; Kurdi, I. Ed). Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah.
Zamakhsharī, M. (1987 AD/1407 AH). al-Kashshāf. (Ahmad, M .Ed). 3rd Edition. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi.
Suyūṭī, J. (2005 AD/1426 AH). al-Itqān fī ʻUlūm al-Qurʼān. (Center for Qur'anic Studies. Ed). Mecca: Center for Qur'anic Studies.
-Ṣadūq, M. (1993 AD/1413 AH). Man Lā Yahḍuruhu al-Faqīh. (Ghaffari, A. Ed). 2nd Edition. Qom: Jami'at al-Mudarrisin Hawzat al-'Ilmiyya Qom.
Ṭabāṭabāʼī, M. (1970 AD/1390 AH). al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʼān. 2nd Edition. Beirut: Mu'assasat al-A'lami lil-Matbu'at.
Ṭabarsī, F. (1993 AD/1372 SH). Majmaʻ al-Bayān. (Yazdi Tabatabai, F; Mahallati, H. Ed). Third Edition. Tehran: Naser Khosrow.
Ṭūsī, M. (1962 AD/1382 AH). al-Tibyān. (Qasir al-Amili, A. Ed). Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi.
Maleki Isfahani, M. (2000 AD/1379 SH). Glossary of Principles, Glossary of Terms, and Encyclopedias. Qom: Allameh.
Fayḍ Kāshānī, M. (1995 AD/1415 AH). Tafsīr al-Ṣāfī. (A'lami, H. Ed). 2nd Edition. Tehran: Maktabat al-Sadr.
A Group of Researchers. (2009 AD/1388 SH). Dictionary of Principles of Jurisprudence. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture.
Mursī, K. (1999 AD/1420 AH). Fawāsil al-Āyāt al-Qurʼānīyyah. Alexandria: Al-Maktab al-Jami'i al-Hadith.
Center for Quranic Culture and Knowledge. (2007 AD). ʻUlūm al-Qurʼān ʻind al-Mufassirīn. 2nd edition. Qom: Boostan Ketab Publications.
Najāshī, A. (1998 AD/1418 AH). Rijāl al- Najāshī. (Shubairi Zanjani, M .Ed). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
Al-Naḥḥās, A. (2000 AD/1421 AH). Iʻrāb al-Qurʼān. (Khalil Ibrahim, A. Ed). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya.
Nosrati, A; Hosseini Zeidi, A; Ghasemi, M. (2021 AD). "The Influence of Contextual Clues in Understanding Hadith from Shaykh Ansari's Perspective." Journal of Quran and Hadith Sciences. No. 106, pp. 223-239