نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه علّامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. mohamadshabanpour@gmail.com
2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه علّامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. fardindarabi@gmail.com
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
n Ibn Arabi's view, which has an Ash'arite theological basis, it does not give
any role to man and natural causes in the world system; And this is because
of his belief in algebra. Allameh Tabataba'i has a Shiite view and for natural
causes, not only did he not consider it roleless, but he also considered it a
longitudinal role, and the longitudinal role is not algebra, and what is algebra
is a transverse role; Therefore, wind, rain, and the like are natural causes that
play the role of agents in the system of the universe and have no
contradiction with monotheism. But Allameh Tabataba'i interprets
monotheistic verses in the same way that he considers natural causes as
longitudinal causes and considers them exactly in accordance with
monotheism and is not opposed to the issue of monotheism. In this research,
consciously or unconsciously, these two scientists, according to the influence
of their theological principles, have adopted such two different methods for a
subject. This article has studied the written works of Allameh Tabataba'i and
Ibn Arabi in a library-documentary manner and has summarized the contents
in the form of a partial comparative method according to the theological
principles of relating natural causes to monotheistic verses
کلیدواژهها [English]